Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Guy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 4 Div. 537PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

It is a well-settled general rule that one who purchases property from a mortgagor without any notice of a transfer of the note by the mortgagee will be protected as a bona fide purchaser when the record exhibits the entry of a satisfaction and release of the mortgage on the margin of the record. Federal Land Bank v. Corinth Bank & Trust Co., 214 Ala. 146, 107 So. 88; Branscomb v. Federal Land Bank, 215 Ala. 242, 110 So. 42.

These cases, however, recognize an exception to the general rule when the purchaser attempts to procure the settlement and satisfaction of the existing mortgage as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fed. Land Bank of New Orleans v. Corinth Bank TrustSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Branscomb v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gantt v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Pratt City Sav. Bank v. Merchants' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Blalock v. WindhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Sixty St. Francis Street v. AMERICAN SAV. AND LOAN ASS'NSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API