Legal Opinion

Preston v. Hubbell

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1948No. Civ. 16125PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

In this action for damages resulting from alleged negligence in the removal of a tooth, plaintiff appeals from a judgment on verdict in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff’s dentist advised the removal of an impacted wisdom tooth and defendant, a specialist, performed the operation. While plaintiff was under an anaesthetic defendant chiseled away the bone over the tooth, removed the top half, separated the tooth from the jawbone down to the lower one-fourth of the roots and removed it with an elevator. There was evidence that the operation was a difficult one, under the conditions, and that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. O'Connor v. MennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Delahunt v. FintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Brooks v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Valdez v. PercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Thor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Ashcraft v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Theobald v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API