Legal Opinion
Theobald v. Byers
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1961No. Civ. 19374PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.
Plaintiffs Raymond Theobald and Eugene P. Aureguy appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant attorneys Robert K. Byers and Bruce Jacobs, in an action for their alleged malpractice.
The record shows that the defendants are attorneys practicing in Gilroy, California, Jacobs being the employee of Byers. On September 5, 1956, plaintiffs employed defendants to prepare a note and chattel mortgage in connection with a loan of $5,000 which plaintiffs were making to John Higgins and Charles Fette, who were engaged in the food canning business, and for whom the defendants did all of their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rising v. VeatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Gambert v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- J. P. Armstrong v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Preston v. HubbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Alfonso Sales v. BacigalupiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Berman v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Ishmael v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.