Legal Opinion

Delahunt v. Finton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1928No. Docket No. 98, Calendar No. 33,238PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for malpractice. There was verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error, assigning 54 reasons for reversal grouped under five heads. Plaintiff claims he employed defendant to advise him as to his condition; that defendant made a partial examination; stated to him it would be necessary to administer an anesthetic to complete th,e examination; that plaintiff went to the hospital in Jackson to have the examination completed, and, without his consent., defendant, while plaintiff was under the influence of an anesthetic, operated on him. In so doing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pratt v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Williams v. LeBarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Luka v. LowrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Turnbull v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Welke v. KuzillaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API