Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Mennie

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1915No. S.F. No. 6162PublishedCited by 52 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Olney, Pringle & Mannon, and J. R Pringle, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

Hearing granted in this court after decision by the district court of appeal for the first district.

This is an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff from the fall of an elevator which occurred during the making of certain repairs upon the City of Paris building in San Francisco.

The defendant was a contractor engaged in doing certain cement and plaster work in the course of said repairs, and while doing such work was using and operating an elevator which had been temporarily placed in said building by the Clinton Fireproofing Company in order to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Janin v. London & San Francisco BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hoff v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Thompson v. Cal. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Smith v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API