Legal Opinion

Ashcraft v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1991No. B043675PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant in this medical malpractice case. Because plaintiff was erroneously nonsuited on her battery cause of action we reverse the judgment as to that cause of action. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

Facts and Proceedings Below

In 1983, plaintiff Daisy Ashcraft, age 16, was diagnosed as having scoliosis, a curvature of the spine, destined to become debilitating if not corrected. Ms. Ashcraft was referred to defendant John D. King, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon.

Ms. Ashcraft went to Dr. King’s office for a consultation. She…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Campbell v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Murphy v. ImplicitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  3. Thomas Avina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Saxena v. GoffneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API