Legal Opinion

Cobbs v. Grant

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1972No. S.F. 22887PublishedCited by 345 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

This medical malpractice case involves two issues: first, whether there was sufficient evidence of negligence in the performing of surgery to sustain a jury verdict for plaintiff; second, whether, under plaintiff’s alternative theory, the instructions to the jury adequately set forth the nature of a medical doctor’s duty to obtain the informed consent of a patient before undertaking treatment. We conclude there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict under the theory that defendant was negligent during the operation. Since there was a general verdict and we are…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by345 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Brzoska v. OlsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Palmer v. Biloxi Regional Medical Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

340 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API