Legal Opinion

Valdez v. Percy

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1939No. Civ. 11860PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J. —

This is an action to recover damages for the alleged malpractice on the part of defendants in so carelessly and negligently rendering surgical and medical treatment to plaintiff as to cause her to suffer the loss of her right breast, including the mammary gland, the pectoral muscles of the right side and all the lymphatic glands of the axilla up to and within the clavicle bone of her body, from all of which it was alleged plaintiff suffered serious painful wounds and bodily disfigurement. These allegations were denied by defendants. The case went to trial before a jury, resulting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Kershaw v. TilburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hutter v. HommelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hively v. HiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Nelson v. GauntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Hundley v. St. Francis HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API