Legal Opinion
Folden v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 28, 2003No. 01-456CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates and Judith A. Long-shore, have filed a complaint against the United States, based on actions taken by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Plaintiffs allege that the FCC breached implied-in-fact contracts with the plaintiffs to award seven cellular licenses by lottery, and also violated the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution by abrogating plaintiffs’ contract rights without compensation. Plaintiffs together seek an aggregate amount of $144,088,000.00, divided on the basis of the…
2Cases cited112 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates, and Judith A. Longshore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Tindle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Arctic King Fisheries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Biltmore Forest Broadcasting FM, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.