Legal Opinion
Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates, and Judith A. Longshore v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 16, 2004No. 20-1616PublishedCited by 338 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates (“Coastal”), and Judith A. Longshore (collectively, “plaintiffs”) appeal the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims (i) granting the United States’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and (ii) granting the United States’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Folden v. United States, 56 Fed.Cl. 43 (2003). On the first point, the court determined that plaintiffs failed to state a claim for breach of contract because they were unable to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Fanning, Phillips and Molnar v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by338 opinions
- Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Gonzalez-McCaulley Investment Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Pikulin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Gravatt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.