Legal Opinion

Tindle v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 30, 2003No. 01-231CPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Senior Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In his Complaint plaintiff alleges the Army Review Board’s denial of his application for correction of his military record was arbitrary and capricious because the Board failed to consider or respond to his claims of error in his court-martial. Defendant’s motion to dismiss asserts plaintiffs Complaint is barred by res judicata because the errors of which he now complains could have been raised in his previous litigation in the United…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Chisolm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. De Maio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API