Legal Opinion
Biltmore Forest Broadcasting FM, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 25, 2008No. 07-316 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff asserts breach of an implied-in-fact contract with the Federal Communica*323tions Commission (“FCC”) for an auction to obtain a FM broadcast license in Biltmore Forest, North Carolina. Plaintiff, the second-highest bidder, asserts that the highest bidder and eventual licensee, Liberty Productions, L.P. (“Liberty”), was not a qualified bidder under the published terms of the auction. By an action filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (“D.C.Circuit”), plaintiff contested the FCC’s decision to award the license to…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- FFTF Restoration Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Biltmore Forest Broadcasting Fm, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Information Sciences Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Resource Conservation Group, LLC v. United States Deparment of NavyUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.