Legal Opinion
Arctic King Fisheries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 27, 2004No. 99-49CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
“Roll on, thou deep and dark blue ocean ... ten thousand fleets sweep over thee in vain ...”2
This regulatory taking ease is before the court following a trial held in Seattle, Washington. Plaintiff seeks just compensation under the Fifth Amendment, alleging that the enactment of the American Fisheries Act (AFA), Pub.L. No. 105-277 (1998), resulted in a taking of its fishing vessel and associated property interests. Based on the evidence presented, and for the reasons that follow, the court concludes that plaintiff is not entitled to recover, as no taking of its property…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kafka v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- City of Gettysburg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Lost Tree Village Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. MertzOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.