Legal Opinion

Gillies v. La Mesa, Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1942No. Civ. 2873PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an action for an injunction, declaratory relief and damages for breach of contract. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend. This is an appeal taken from the judgment.

Plaintiffs are owners of land riparian to the San Diego River. The La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District (hereinafter called the district) is an irrigation district organized under the California Irrigation District Act, approved March 31, 1897, as amended, fStats. 1897, p. 254; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act. 3854.] The,individual defendants are the directors of the district.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Merkley v. MerkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Wallace Ranch Water Co. v. Foothill Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of San Diego v. United States Gypsum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Cherry v. Home Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Wilson v. Transit AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Dynamic Industries Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Harmon v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API