Harmon v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
In his complaint plaintiff alleges that for some time prior to February, 1959, defendant had furnished him with two-party residential telephone service. The regular monthly charge therefor was a flat rate of $3.50 plus 35 cents tax, making a total charge of $3.85 per month. Up to and including February 13, 1959, plaintiff had paid in full for all service charges for which he was billed. On the statement dated March 13, 1959, defendant billed plaintiff for message units and tax thereon in the amount of 52 cents in addition to the regular monthly service charge and tax of $3.85. On the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gillies v. La Mesa, Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Southern California Telephone Co. v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
3Cited by10 opinions
- Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Vila v. Tahoe Southside Water UtilityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.