Legal Opinion

City of San Diego v. United States Gypsum Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1994No. B064835PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

A city sues various defendants for damages stemming from installation of asbestos in its buildings. The statute of limitations for injury to city’s real property is three years. (Code Civ. Proc., § 338, subd. (b).) The statute of limitations begins to run when city suffers an appreciable and actual harm.

Here we hold, among other things, appreciable harm is not limited to the existence of an actual health hazard. As pleaded, the city’s knowledge of deterioration to its buildings caused by asbestos constitutes the infliction of an appreciable harm that begins the statute of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. San Francisco Unified School District v. W.R. Grace & Company-ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. California Sansome Co. Polk Market Co. v. U.S. Gypsum W.R. Grace & Company,--Conn.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API