Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LaBahn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2003No. OSB 99-2; SC S48901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that, among other charges, the accused violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation) and DR 6-101(B) (prohibiting neglect of legal matter). The facts centered on the accused’s alleged neglect of a civil case that the trial court had dismissed for failure to prosecute and his subsequent failure to tell the client about the dismissal for over one year. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReddenOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CoynerOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KochOregon Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API