Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Knappenberger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2006No. OSB 03-104; SC S52757PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with one violation of former Disciplinary Rule (DR) 6-101(B) (neglecting a legal matter entrusted to the lawyer). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found the accused guilty of that violation and suspended the accused from the practice of law for one year. The accused seeks review in this court. ORS 9.536(1); Bar Rules of Procedure (BR) 10.1 and 10.3. We consider the matter de novo and may adopt, modify, or reject the decision of the trial panel. ORS 9.536(3) and BR 10.6. The Bar has the burden of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LoewOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReddenOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KochOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In re BertoniOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API