In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Coyner
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding in which the accused was found guilty by a trial panel of a total of nine violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility 1 arising out of three separate matters. The trial panel imposed a six-month suspension from the practice of law, with the further provision that the accused be required to apply for reinstatement formally. The accused appeals from that decision. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial panel’s findings respecting the accused’s guilt, but modify its choice of sanction.
We make the following preliminary observations. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ProbstOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GeurtsOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GroomOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.