Legal Opinion

In Re Maricopa County Superior Court No. Mh2003-000240

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 13, 2003No. 1 CA-MH 03-0006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal concerns the superior court’s order that Appellant undergo treatment in a program of combined inpatient and outpatient treatment until she is no longer persistently or acutely disabled. The Appellant patient argues that the court committed reversible error, advancing two alternate theories. She first contends that the superior court lacked any discretion to deny her request for a continuance. Alternatively, the patient asserts that if the court had the discretion to deny her request for a continuance, it abused its discretion by doing so. For…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BarrerasArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Mental Health No. MH 95-0074Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Bustos v. W.M. Grace DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. SEMPRE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. In re MH 2007-001264Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. WordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. In Re Mh2010-002348Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. STATE EX REL. INDUS. COM'N v. WordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API