Legal Opinion

In Re Mh2010-002348

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 29, 2011No. 1 CA-MH 11-0013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 This matter requires us to consider the relationship between the statutes governing those found Guilty Except Insane (“GEI”) pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) sections 13-502 and -3994 (2010), and those that apply to administering involuntary treatment to persons in civil commitment proceedings. A.R.S. §§ 36-501 to - 546.01 (2009). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s ruling ordering Appellant, a patient committed to the Arizona State Hospital (“Hospital”) pursuant to a GEI adjudication, to receive court-ordered treatment.

Facts and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. State v. ArmstrongArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Jesse M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Schlecht v. SchielArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Fry v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Mh2014-002674Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. In Re: Mh2020-007661Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API