In Re Mh2010-002348
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 This matter requires us to consider the relationship between the statutes governing those found Guilty Except Insane (“GEI”) pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) sections 13-502 and -3994 (2010), and those that apply to administering involuntary treatment to persons in civil commitment proceedings. A.R.S. §§ 36-501 to - 546.01 (2009). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s ruling ordering Appellant, a patient committed to the Arizona State Hospital (“Hospital”) pursuant to a GEI adjudication, to receive court-ordered treatment.
Facts and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. ArmstrongArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Jesse M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Schlecht v. SchielArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Fry v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Mh2014-002674Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- In Re: Mh2020-007661Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2021