Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. Word

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 21, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOWNIE, Judge.

¶ 1 Tommy Word, dba Pacific Mechanical Service (“Word”), appeals the superior court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. Resolution of this case turns on interpretation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-907(E), a statute addressing the collection of judgments from employers who fail to maintain workers’ compensation insurance for their employees. For the following reasons, we reverse the superior court’s ruling and remand with instructions to grant Word’s Rule 60(e) motion.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. State v. ReynoldsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Columbia Parcar Corp. v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. INDUS. COM'N v. WordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. WordArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  3. STATE EX REL. INDUS. COM'N v. WordArizona Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API