Legal Opinion

SEMPRE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 22, 2010No. 1 CA-TX 08-0008PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Sempre Limited Partnership (“Sempre”) filed an action in the Arizona Tax Court to challenge the Maricopa County Assessor’s valuation of Sempre’s real property. The tax court dismissed Sempre’s claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, concluding that Sempre was required to seek administrative review pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) sections 42-12153 (2006) and 42-16051 (2006) before proceeding in superior court. Considering these statutes together with A.R.S. §§ 42-16201(A) (2006) and 42-15104 (2006), we hold that a taxpayer such as Sempre need…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Erlenbaugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Lerner v. DMB Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Anthony Garcia v. Hon. butler/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Steven Lane Fuller v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API