Legal Opinion
Bustos v. W.M. Grace Development
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 20, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 97-0042PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
Appellant W.M. Grace Corporation (“Grace”) appeals from denial of its motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(c)(5) and (6), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. Grace asserts that, under Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2302 (1994), the judgment against it has been satisfied by medical payments to appellee in advance of the judgment. We agree.
Facts and Procedural History
Martha Bustos (“Bustos”) sued Grace for damages after she slipped and fell in a facility owned and managed by Grace. After the case was transferred to arbitration, Grace…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Chaffin v. Commissioner of Arizona Department of Real EstateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Caballero v. Farmers Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Norwest Bank (Minnesota), N.A. v. SymingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Walter v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Moedt v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- In Re Maricopa County Superior Court No. Mh2003-000240Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.