Legal Opinion

In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Mental Health No. MH 95-0074

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 22, 1996No. 1 CA-MH 95-0001PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

K.B. 1 appeals from the trial court’s finding that she is persistently or acutely disabled and its order that she undergo inpatient treatment. For the reasons which follow, we vacate the order for treatment. See Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 36-540(A).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

K.B. was arrested for trespassing on August 6, 1995, and held in the Coconino County Jail. Subsequently, an application for involuntary evaluation, see A.R.S. § 36-520, and a resultant petition for evaluation, see § 36-523, were submitted to the superior court. On August 14, 1995, the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered PersonArizona Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. In re MH 2006-000023Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. In re Maricopa County Superior Court No. MH 2003-000058Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. In Re Maricopa County Superior Court No. Mh2003-000240Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API