Legal Opinion
Zamora v. Reinstein
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1996No. CV-95-0335PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSE, Judge. *
The state petitioned this court for review of a court of appeals opinion interpreting AR.S. § 13-604(U)(l)(a) (Supp.1995). See Zamora v. Superior Court, 183 Ariz. 470, 904 P.2d 1294 (App.1995). We granted review, and we now vacate the court of appeals’ opinion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article 6, § 5(3), Arizona Constitution, and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1993, the legislature extensively amended the sentence enhancement scheme for dangerous and repeat offenders, effective January 1, 1994. See A.R.S. §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. StroudArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.