Legal Opinion

State v. Van Hook

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1988No. 87-1159PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

Appellant asserts as his first proposition of law that the trial court failed to suppress the con*258fession given by appellant to Cincinnati homicide detective William Davis. The confession was made while appellant was in the custody of the Broward County Sheriff’s office in Ft. Lauder-dale, Florida, awaiting extradition to Cincinnati. Actually, the Ft. Lauder-dale police had sought appellant for some time in their area. This was upon the recommendation of Detective Davis, who had received information through telephone calls from appellant’s family.

On the morning of April 1, 1985, appellant was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bobby v. Van HookSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API