State v. Landrum
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
We have reviewed Landrum’s thirty-one propositions of law, independently assessed the evidence relating to the death sentence, independently balanced the merged aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors, and evaluated the proportionality of the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. As a result, we affirm the convictions and sentence of death.
I
Prosecutorial Misconduct
Propositions I, II and XVI all argue alleged misconduct by the prosecutor. In his first proposition of law, Landrum argues various comments by the prosecutor deprived him of constitutional rights against…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by491 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
486 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.