Legal Opinion

State v. Landrum

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1990No. 89-454PublishedCited by 491 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

We have reviewed Landrum’s thirty-one propositions of law, independently assessed the evidence relating to the death sentence, independently balanced the merged aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors, and evaluated the proportionality of the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. As a result, we affirm the convictions and sentence of death.

I

Prosecutorial Misconduct

Propositions I, II and XVI all argue alleged misconduct by the prosecutor. In his first proposition of law, Landrum argues various comments by the prosecutor deprived him of constitutional rights against…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by491 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001

486 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API