Legal Opinion

Arizona v. Roberson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 15, 1988No. 87-354PublishedCited by 897 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

In Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U. S. 477, 484-485 (1981), we held that a suspect who has “expressed his desire to deal with the police only through counsel is not subject to further interrogation by the authorities until counsel has been made available to him, unless the accused himself initiates further communication, exchanges, or conversations with the police.” In this case Arizona asks us to craft an exception to that rule for cases in which the police want to interrogate a suspect about an offense that is unrelated to the subject of their initial interrogation. Several years ago the Arizona…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by897 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

892 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API