Legal Opinion

Bobby v. Van Hook

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 9, 2009No. 09-144PublishedCited by 461 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted habeas relief to Robert Van Hook on the ground that he did not receive effective assistance of counsel during the sentencing phase of his capital trial. Because we think it clear that Van Hook’s attorneys met the constitutional minimum of compe*5tence under the correct standard, we grant the petition and reverse.

I

On February 18, 1985, Van Hook went to a Cincinnati bar that catered to homosexual men, hoping to find someone to rob. He approached David Self, and after the two spent several hours drinking together they left for Self’s apartment.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by461 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. PaddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

456 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API