State v. Mills
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
We are required by R.C. 2929.05(A) to review Mills’s twenty-six propositions of law. We are also charged with making an independent review of the record to determine whether the aggravating circumstance outweighs the mitigating factors asserted beyond a reasonable doubt. Last, we must decide whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the convictions, with certain exceptions, and uphold the sentence of death.
*361I
We first address defendant’s asserted errors that arise from pretrial procedures…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by982 opinions
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
977 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.