Legal Opinion

State v. Waddy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1992No. 90-22PublishedCited by 449 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

I

Joinder

In his first and second propositions of law, Waddy challenges the joinder of the fifteen-count indictment with the six-count Paula Mason indictment.

Waddy argues, in his first proposition, that the joinder of the Wilson, Jackson, and Milligan crimes with the murder prejudiced him in the penalty phase. The court of appeals found no prejudice because the trial court specifically instructed the jury “ * * * not to consider in any way the evidence pertaining to crimes committed by the defendant against other persons.” However, Waddy argues that the instruction could not erase the evidence…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by449 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006

444 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API