Legal Opinion

State v. Madrigal

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2000No. 97-98PublishedCited by 824 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

In this appeal, Madrigal raises seventeen propositions of law. Finding no reversible error, we affirm his convictions. In addition, we have independently reviewed the record, weighed the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors, and examined the proportionality of the death sentence in this case in comparison to the penalty imposed in similar cases. Upon a complete review of the record, we affirm Madrigal’s convictions and sentences.

Admission of Co-Defendant’s Statements

Chris Cathcart was an accomplice to the robbery of the KFC and murder of Misty Fisher. Cathcart remained in…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by824 opinions

  1. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002

819 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API