Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Truscott

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2006No. CIV.A.03-1831 PLFPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Paul L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiffs pro se complaint asserts Title VII and other claims arising from years of alleged harassment and abusive behavior by plaintiff’s co-workers and superiors at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (“ATF”), 2 where plaintiff has worked since about 1977. Plaintiff has filed two motions for injunctive relief based on the claims set forth in her Second Amended Complaint, as well as on another apparent claim of discrimination related…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Nurriddin v. BoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Na'im v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Lewis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API