Legal Opinion
Rattigan v. Gonzales
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 25, 2009No. Civil Action 04-2009 (ESH)PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wilfred Rattigan, an attorney, has been employed in various positions within the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) since 1987. (2d Am. Compl. ¶¶ 9, 11.) The crux of this case, however, relates to his tenure as an assistant legal attaché (“ALAT”) and then as legal at-taché (“LEGAT”) at the FBI’s office in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from 1999 to 2003. (See id. ¶¶ 15, 19, 37.) Plaintiff contends that his employer discriminated against him and subjected him to a hostile work environment because of his race, religion, and/or national origin and…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Franklin v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Baloch v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Robinson-Reeder v. Am. Council on Educ.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Bergbauer v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.