Legal Opinion
Nurriddin v. Bolden
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 4, 2009No. Civil Action 04-2052 (JDB)PublishedCited by 178 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ahmad Nurriddin was employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) from May 1991 through February 2004 in the Educational Affairs Division. His time there was beset by a years-long series of conflicts with his supervisors and other NASA employees, which has resulted in two employment discrimination lawsuits against the agency. His first lawsuit, Civil Action No. 99-3401, covering a series of events from 1991 through August 1996, was brought pro se under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Ahmad Nurriddin v. Charles BoldenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Laughlin v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Bergbauer v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.