Legal Opinion
Na'im v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 19, 2009No. Civil Action No.: 06-2237 (RMU)PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff claims that during her tenure of employment with the defendant, her supervisors discriminated against her on the basis of her race by fostering a hostile work environment and by retaliating against her for exercising her rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq 2 Prior to discovery, the court granted partial summary judgment in the defendant’s…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Baird v. GotbaumCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Bergbauer v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Wade v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.