Richter v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGargano, J.
This is a judgment roll appeal and we are severely handicapped by a sketchy record. Moreover, the parties did not appear at oral argument to answer questions. Thus, we find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to resolve their conflicting versions of crucial facts allegedly established by the evidence. However, we have carefully reviewed the limited record (the exhibits in particular) and with a few critical gaps the essential facts are as follows.
Edward R. Richter and Marvel Richter, respondents herein, own real property in Sacramento County. The property is located in an R-2 (2-family…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Johnston v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Sausalito v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Scrutton v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Court House Plaza Co. v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Ball v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- City & County of San Francisco v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.