Legal Opinion

Johnston v. City of Claremont

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1958No. L. A. 24247PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants appeal from a judgment in a declaratory relief action which held that an ordinance of the city of Claremont rezoning plaintiffs’ property as commercial property was valid.

Plaintiffs’ property is located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Mountain Avenue in Claremont, extending 959 feet in a westerly direction along the south side of Foothill and 569 feet in a southerly direction along the west side of Mountain. Most of it is planted in citrus trees, but on the northeast corner there are a reservoir, water well, and pumping plant, which have been used…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API