Wheeler v. Gregg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiffs herein, numbering 25 individual and one corporate property owners whose properties Re within 3,000 feet of 115 acres of land owned or leased by defendant Gregg, instituted this action to have declared unconstitutional and void the action of the council of the city of Los Angeles whereby, on October 2, 1946, said council granted to defendant Gregg a variance permit (in reality a conditional use permit under section 12.24 of Ordinance No. 90500) to excavate for the commercial production of rock, sand and gravel in an area of land containing some 105 acres. Plaintiffs alleged that the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Johnston v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.