Legal Opinion

City of Sausalito v. County of Marin

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1970No. Civ. 26883PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RATTIGAN, J.

In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, plaintiffs sought to invalidate certain actions taken by the County of Marin in the process of applying its zoning ordinance to “Marincello,” a large (2,100-acre) tract located within that county. The individual plaintiffs own land adjacent to the tract: the incorporated limits of the plaintiff city, while not including any part of the tract, are coterminous with some of its. boundaries. The named defendants included the County of Marin and its board of supervisors, planning commission, planning director, and director of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Taschner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Midway Orchards v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API