Legal Opinion
Carr v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 17, 2005No. SC 17272PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Bridgewater (zoning commission), appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal by the plaintiff, John F. Carr, Jr., from the zoning commission’s denial of the plaintiffs subdivision application seeking approval of an affordable housing development within the meaning of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 8-30g, as amended by Public Acts 1999, No. 99-261, and by portions of Public Acts 2000, No. 00-206 (P.A. 00-206), that have been determined to be retroactive.1 The zoning commis*577sion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Roberts v. CatonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Jalowiec Realty Associates, L.P. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Wiltzius v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Roncari Industries, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- City of Bridgeport v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.