Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Caton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 2, 1993No. 14534PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether an amendment to General Statutes § 52-577d, *485which extends the statute of limitations for a civil action for damages caused by sexual assault of a minor, may be retroactively applied. The plaintiff, Pamela Roberts, brought a civil action for damages against the defendant, Alex Catón, her grandfather, alleging that the defendant had sexually assaulted her from the time she was five years old until she was approximately eleven years old. The trial court granted the plaintiffs application for prejudgment remedies and ordered attachment and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Montinieri v. Southern New England Telephone, Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jefferson CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Doe v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.