Legal Opinion
State v. Nowell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 18, 2003No. SC 16798PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendant, Horace Nowell, was charged with one count of sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (a)1 and one count of possession of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 21a-279 (d).2 He *689thereafter filed a motion to suppress certain evidence and statements he had made to the police. Following the trial court’s denial of that motion, the defendant, pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 54-94a,3 entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere to one count of sale of narcotics4 in violation of § 2…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. KnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. ForemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.