Legal Opinion
Bigelow v. City of Ontario
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 1940No. Civ. 2435PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment against the City of Ontario for damages resulting from personal injuries suffered by Mrs. Pearl Bigelow, wife of N. H. Bigelow, on August 14, 1937, while riding over Sultana Avenue, a public street of that city, as a guest in an automobile' belonging to and being driven by her son-in-law. Appeal is also taken from an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The Southern Pacific Company was joined as defendant. Judgment went in its favor and no appeal has been taken from that portion of the judgment. We will hereafter refer to the City…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Uttley v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Gentekos v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Plaza v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Barker v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.