Legal Opinion
Plaza v. City of San Mateo
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1954No. Civ. 15672PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINLEY, J. pro tern. *
This appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of respondents city' of San Mateo and Matt Thiltgen after their demurrer to appellant’s complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
It is alleged in the complaint that the city of San Mateo is a municipal corporation; that it operated the San Mateo Municipal Golf Course to which the public was invited; that at the time of appellant’s injury defendant Tom Fry was employed by the city as a golf professional and respondent Matt Thiltgen as recreational director; that on May 24, 1952, after paying the required admission fee…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Kellar v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Teilhet v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Farrell v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.