Legal Opinion
Uttley v. City of Santa Ana
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1933No. Docket No. 1449PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action for damages for injuries received by the plaintiff about midnight on February 28, 1932. At the intersection of Tenth Street and Broadway, in the City of Santa Ana, there was at that time a dip or depression across Broadway which had been constructed for the purpose of carrying storm waters. It was stipulated that in October, 1931, this dip had been changed by making the gutter somewhat deeper and by raising the height of one of the shoulders in order to cause the water to flow along Tenth Street instead of along…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Wagner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Kennedy v. City of GustineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Ridge v. Boulder Creek Union Junior-Senior High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Spencer v. City of CalipatriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.