Legal Opinion
Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 2, 1994No. 14795PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the defendant Susan Oygard filed a timely appeal to the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Coventry (board), challenging the decision of the town’s zoning enforcement officer to grant the application of the plaintiff, Alan J. Koepke, for a zoning permit. We conclude that Oygard’s appeal to the board was timely filed.
The relevant facts and procedural background are summarized as follows. The plaintiff sought to build a 150 foot radio tower adjacent to property owned by Oygard. After the plaintiff had discussed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Francini v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Gagnon v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals of CoventrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Loulis v. ParrottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Jalowiec Realty Associates, L.P. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Grasso v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Groton Long Point Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Carr v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Munroe v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.