Legal Opinion
Loulis v. Parrott
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 20, 1997No. SC 15517PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
This appeal presents issues regarding the applicability of the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies to an action for an injunction against an alleged prospective zoning violation. The plaintiffs, Frederick J. Loulis and Margaret, Loulis,1 appeal, upon our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment of dismissal of their action on the ground that the plaintiffs had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies.2 The plaintiffs sought an injunction against the defendants, Bart Center, Inc., and Vernon…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Antinerella v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bridgeport Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Southwest Soil Remediation, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Johnson v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Fox v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Munroe v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.