Legal Opinion
Caserta v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 18, 1991No. 14134PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the city of Milford (board),1 had subject matter jurisdiction to hear the appeal of the plaintiff, James Caserta, from a revocation by the zoning enforcement officer of a zoning permit previously issued to the plaintiff by that officer. We conclude that it did.
The plaintiff had been issued a zoning permit by the zoning enforcement officer, Peter Crabtree. The permit was subsequently revoked by Crabtree on order of the then chairman of the planning and zoning board, Angelo Marino. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Shea v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Leo Fedus & Sons Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Town of North Haven v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.